The news that Google bought the Motorola Mobility struck the IT world. American experts mostly signaled positive reactions about Google’s acquisition of Motorola Mobility. But, in my viewpoint, Google should have remained software-centered company, and should have cooperated with excellent manufacturing companies like Korean or Taiwan ones.
Following Apple’s smartphones, if Google also makes smartphones, the IT world would be thrown into the one of complex theories which can not be figured out and managed by human strategies. Outside the U. S. it is doubted that the fewer companies of the U.S. are governing the information world, simultaneously contents and hardware.
The super-leveled companies and countries like Apple, Google, MS, the U.S. and China, should not seek the monopolistic, vertical works. If the super eats out all of pie, the span of prosperity would be short. The typical example is Japan. As a result, Japan has no creativity like the U.S. and Japan’s manufacutring qualities and efficiencies are being overtaken by ones of the developing countries.
It should be understood that Globalization means the harmony of coexsitence and competiton rather than the survival games among the players and countries.
The old strong countries have fantasy about the super position like in the Imperial Age. But the super position of the few resulted in tremendout sacrifices of many countries. It is believed that the history has progressed, despite undulating movements of the advance and retreat. The God and global ecoeconomy will not permit the unjustice of the past Colonial Age.
Internet is a gift of the God to humans, so ICT companies must not seek excessive monopolistic power and profits beyond common grades recognized by the global citizens. (The end)
댓글 없음:
댓글 쓰기